C-MAX
side view C-MAX
C-MAX vs Grand C-MAX
Turbocharged petrol EcoBoost 1.6 litre engine produces 148 bhp
Interior C-MAX EcoBoost
If you regularly carried six or seven, they'd be perpetually squabbling over allocation of the meagre space, and you'd wish with every passing mile that you'd sprung for an S-Max to shut them up. Anyone of teenage years wouldn't fit in there unless the middle-row occupants slid forward. With all seven chairs erected, the boot is miniscule, and the back seats themselves are tiny.
But the opposition feels roomier. As a seven-seater, it's OK for the primary-school run or occasional trips at the zoo with the grandparents. If you want a Grand C-Max, you know who you are. Mind you, if you filled it with people and drove vigorously enough to find that out, anyone in the back would be projectile vomiting.
The boxier, glassier Grand C-Max comes with pretty well all the same dynamic advantages, though it wallows a trifle more. So the C-Max manages to give as much room as the old one while stirring in a far more eye-catching design, all faceted ends, arched roof and kicked-up waist. The shell is designed for the tougher Euro NCAP and all global crashing rules, so I trust it's strong. A Meriva shows how to do it.
By contrast, folding into the max-luggage mode is a bit of a mess. It gives colossal legroom. With only four of you, the central rear seat folds up, and the outer pair slide towards each other and then back between the rear wheelarches. Everyone has enough legroom, and the boot's deep enough to have an echo.
As a five-seater, the C-Max fares well. It's so good you never think about it, but actually it greatly reduces the effort of being smooth in normal traffic-soaked driving. Their efforts are matched; their actions, graceful. The action and calibration of the throttle, clutch, gearshift and steering is wonderfully sorted. As Fords tend to, this one feels like the money has been spent in the right places.
You could ferret around and grumble that the glovebox and door bins are crappy plastic, but that'd miss the point. Sounds good, though. On the downside, the highline nav screen is a bit small, and the top-end Sony stereo's fascia is as nice as the regular Ford buttons. And it is, using convincing amounts of soft plastic and real chrome, and beautifully fluid graphics on the two display screens. The busy, attention-grabbing dash design demands that it's nicely made.
From the driver's angle, the cockpit is a fine job. All this with a ride that's taut and well-damped but does a superb job of reducing big fast bumps, and rounding off the grumbly broken roads of suburbia. The handling is safe but utterly predictable, yet it maintains a sprinkling of wry amusement. There's none of the loose, wispy feel ofthe French opposition, or thepuddingy responses of the German.
But, boy, does it come close. It rolls more, and reacts more slowly, than the best Fords. It would be a porky to say this high-seated vehicle drives like a car. Instead of the horrid videogame feel these usually have, it feels barely different to drive than the old hydraulic set-up (ie, just fine), but lets you go about 10 miles further on a fuel tank.
The big change is that it's now got electric power steering. It was the best-handling, and pretty much best-riding, hatch. For suspension, it's mostly detail tweaks on the outgoing Focus's set-up, but there's absolutely no shame in that. The top diesel (and the petrol later) gets the option of a twin-clutch sequential 'box, which I'd call paddleshift except there are none, so you override using the lever. And there's a pair of newly - and impressively - refined diesels that run up to 140bhp.
Other petrol choices include the 1.6 non-turbo from the Fiesta, which is probably in torque deficit for this car. That six-speed 'box is also new, and glides with glossy ease between the slots. Or you can shift up very early and get fine economy and relaxed, quiet progress. It's got diesely torque, but a far smoother, more refined nature, and pulls with vigour from sub-2,000rpm until it just tails away a bit towards 6,000, so it's a fine motor for overtaking or dispatching twisty roads without too much gearchanging. There's a technically similar 2.0 in the Mondeo and S-Max now, but the 1.6 is lighter and more compact and beautifully suited to cars this size.
It's a 1.6 with variable valve-timing, direct injection and a turbo for 150bhp. Under the stubby hood, we find the headline ‘EcoBoost' engine, Ford's take on the downsizing game. The Grand C-Max is 13cm longer in the wheelbase, has seven seats in three rows, and sliding rear doors. The C-Max is a five-seater with conventional hinged doors. This time around, the omission has been rectified, with a two-body range.
The C-Max was always the best-driving of the small MPVs, but Ford had always thrown the match by refusing to build a seven-seat edition to go into bat against the likes of the Zafira, Grand Picasso, Grand Scenic and Touran. If this range stiffs, Ford is in a distinctly unhappy place. Which will be sold all around the world until it amounts to a staggering two million cars a year in 10 body styles by 2012. It shows off the brand-new efficient and powerful petrol engine, new gearbox, new steering, new instruments and cabin finish, new body structure, and all sorts of other bits that'll be rolled out across the rest of the new C-Max, Focus, Kuga and related ranges.
It's the first of a new generation of Focuses. The new C-Max isn't just important to people who buy small MPVs. But stick with me here. check the screen for a ‘SIM error' message. radio silence...
But a new C-Max... Some new Fords immediately grab your attention - if I was getting first dibs on a Focus RS, I'd be abuzz with texts from folks back at the office asking how good it is. No really, you want to read to the end of this review.